Re: [PATCH] Docs/mm/damon/design: describe the differences for pageout's virtual address and physcial address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Barry,

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:50:23 +1300 Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> The doc needs update. As only in the case of virtual address, we are
> calling madvise() with MADV_PAGEOUT; but in the case of physical
> address, we are actually calling reclaim_pages() directly. And
> madvise() with MADV_PAGEOUT is much more aggresive on reclamation
> compared to reclaim_pages() on paddr.

Thank you for this nice patch :)

> 
> Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> index 8c89d26f0baa..6c50743552f5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> @@ -315,7 +315,13 @@ that supports each action are as below.
>     Supported by ``vaddr`` and ``fvaddr`` operations set.
>   - ``cold``: Call ``madvise()`` for the region with ``MADV_COLD``.
>     Supported by ``vaddr`` and ``fvaddr`` operations set.
> - - ``pageout``: Call ``madvise()`` for the region with ``MADV_PAGEOUT``.
> + - ``pageout``: Call ``madvise()`` for the region with ``MADV_PAGEOUT`` if
> +   the region is using virtual address; otherwise, call ``reclaim_pages()``
> +   for the region if physical address is used.
> +   ``madvise()``  with ``MADV_PAGEOUT``  is aggressively reclaiming memory
> +   when pages are not shared by multiple processes. Differently, paddr's
> +   pageout  will do the best-effort reclamation by scanning PTEs to figure
> +   out if pages are young, if not, pages are reclaimed.

I think this might be too much details.  Especially, explanation of
``MADV_PAGEOUT`` might better to be done on it's document.  We wouldn't want to
update two places for future changes to ``MADV_PAGEOUT``.  What do you think
about making it simple and independent from the implementation detail?  For
example,

    - - ``pageout``: Call ``madvise()`` for the region with ``MADV_PAGEOUT``.
    + - ``pageout``: Reclaim the region.

Thanks,
SJ

>     Supported by ``vaddr``, ``fvaddr`` and ``paddr`` operations set.
>   - ``hugepage``: Call ``madvise()`` for the region with ``MADV_HUGEPAGE``.
>     Supported by ``vaddr`` and ``fvaddr`` operations set.
> -- 
> 2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux