[PATCH RFC bpf-next v3 08/16] bpf/verifier: do_misc_fixups for is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_kfunc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is still a WIP, but I think this can be dropped as we never
get to this instruction. So what should we do here?

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4766c43606c4..8a9f268c4ee2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -19720,7 +19720,8 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback) {
+		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback ||
+		    is_bpf_timer_set_sleepable_cb_kfunc(insn->imm)) {
 			/* The verifier will process callback_fn as many times as necessary
 			 * with different maps and the register states prepared by
 			 * set_timer_callback_state will be accurate.

-- 
2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux