Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 03/10] bpf/verifier: allow more maps in sleepable bpf programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 06:18:32PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> These 2 maps types are required for HID-BPF when a user wants to do
> IO with a device from a sleepable tracing point.
> 
> Allowing BPF_MAP_TYPE_QUEUE (and therefore BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK) allows
> for a BPF program to prepare from an IRQ the list of HID commands to send
> back to the device and then these commands can be retrieved from the
> sleepable trace point.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> 
> changes in v2:
> - dropped BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY from the list
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 67da3f7bddb5..cb1266566b69 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -18094,6 +18094,8 @@ static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>  		case BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE:
>  		case BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE:
>  		case BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGRP_STORAGE:
> +		case BPF_MAP_TYPE_QUEUE:
> +		case BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK:
>  			break;

Maybe resend this one and patch 1 without RFC, so we can start landing them?




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux