Hi Greg,
On 2/9/2024 2:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:13:14PM -0800, Wesley Cheng wrote:
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Don't try to remove a secondary interrupter that is known to be invalid.
Also check if the interrupter is valid inside the spinlock that protects
the array of interrupters.
Found by smatch static checker
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/ffaa0a1b-5984-4a1f-bfd3-9184630a97b9@moroto.mountain/
Fixes: c99b38c41234 ("xhci: add support to allocate several interrupters")
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240125152737.2983959-2-mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Wait, this is already in my tree, right? Why keep sending it?
Sorry, I noticed this yesterday night as well when I was preparing some
changes to push elsewhere. Will remove the ones I saw that were already
present on usb-next.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
