Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 15:58:06 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 24/09/13 14:50, Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
> > +* Samsung S5PC110/S5PV210 Clock Controller
> > +
> > +The S5PV210 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various controllers
> > +within the SoC. The clock binding described here is applicable to all SoCs in
> > +the S5PC110/S5PV210 family.
> > +
> > +Required Properties:
> > +
> > +- compatible: should be "samsung,s5pv210-clock".
> 
> I have nothing against this compatible value, but wouldn't it be more
> accurate to use, e.g. "samsung,s5pv210-cmu" - for Clock Management Unit,
> as this IP block is also referred to in the documentation ?
> 
> May just be me, but "samsung,s5pv210-clock" sounds like just one
> specific clock type.

In the user's manual I have, this IP is referred to either as "CMU", as
you suggested, or simply as "clock controller". "CMU" is not very
meaningfull, so "samsung,s5pv210-clock-controller" would be the best here
I guess, but for consistency with other Samsung's clock bindings, I'd
suggest leaving this as is in the patch.

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux