Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/mempolicy: introduce MPOL_WEIGHTED_INTERLEAVE for weighted interleaving

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 11:02:47AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > index d8cc3a577986..4e5a640d10b8 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -1878,11 +1878,17 @@ bool apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)
> >
> >  static unsigned int weighted_interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
> >  {
> > -       unsigned int node = current->il_prev;
> > -
> > -       if (!current->il_weight || !node_isset(node, policy->nodes)) {
> > -               node = next_node_in(node, policy->nodes);
> > -               /* can only happen if nodemask is being rebound */
> > +       unsigned int node;
> 
> IIUC, "node" may be used without initialization.
> 

ok i should slow down lol.  This should take care of it.


diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index d8cc3a577986..ed0d5d2d456a 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1878,11 +1878,17 @@ bool apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)

 static unsigned int weighted_interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
 {
-       unsigned int node = current->il_prev;
-
-       if (!current->il_weight || !node_isset(node, policy->nodes)) {
+       unsigned int node;
+       unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
+
+retry:
+       /* to prevent miscount use tsk->mems_allowed_seq to detect rebind */
+       cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+       node = current->il_prev;
+       if (!node || !node_isset(node, policy->nodes)) {
                node = next_node_in(node, policy->nodes);
-               /* can only happen if nodemask is being rebound */
+               if (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie))
+                       goto retry;
                if (node == MAX_NUMNODES)
                        return node;
                current->il_prev = node;
@@ -1896,8 +1902,14 @@ static unsigned int weighted_interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
 static unsigned int interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
 {
        unsigned int nid;
+       unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
+
+       /* to prevent miscount, use tsk->mems_allowed_seq to detect rebind */
+       do {
+               cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+               nid = next_node_in(current->il_prev, policy->nodes);
+       } while (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie));

-       nid = next_node_in(current->il_prev, policy->nodes);
        if (nid < MAX_NUMNODES)
                current->il_prev = nid;
        return nid;
@@ -2374,6 +2386,7 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_array_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
                struct page **page_array)
 {
        struct task_struct *me = current;
+       unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
        unsigned long total_allocated = 0;
        unsigned long nr_allocated = 0;
        unsigned long rounds;
@@ -2391,7 +2404,13 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_array_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
        if (!nr_pages)
                return 0;

-       nnodes = read_once_policy_nodemask(pol, &nodes);
+       /* read the nodes onto the stack, retry if done during rebind */
+       do {
+               cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+               nnodes = read_once_policy_nodemask(pol, &nodes);
+       } while (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie));
+
+       /* if the nodemask has become invalid, we cannot do anything */
        if (!nnodes)
                return 0;





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux