On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:48:23AM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Le mardi 30 janvier 2024 à 10:23 +0100, Christian König a écrit : > > I would say we start with the DMA-API by getting away from sg_tables > > to something cleaner and state oriented. > > FYI I am already adding a 'dma_vec' object in my IIO DMABUF patchset, > which is just a dead simple > > struct dma_vec { > dma_addr_t addr; > size_t len; > }; > > (The rationale for introducing it in the IIO DMABUF patchset was that > the "scatterlist" wouldn't allow me to change the transfer size.) > > So I believe a new "sg_table"-like could just be an array of struct > dma_vec + flags. Yeah that's pretty much the proposal I've seen, split the sg table into input data (struct page + len) and output data (which is the dma_addr_t + len you have above). The part I don't expect to ever happen, because it hasn't the past 20 or so years, is that the dma-api will give us information about what is needed to keep the buffers coherency between various devices and the cpu. -Sima -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch