Hi Boris,
On 1/24/2024 10:31 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:25:17AM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> This can be confusing since it implies that the patch you mention
>> introduces the issue but instead the variable has been unneeded since
>> the original:
>> 92bd5a139033 ("x86/resctrl: Add interface to write mbm_total_bytes_config")
>
> What I said. :)
Right from the start, yes.
>
>> To help clarify you can mention this order of events and also add an
>> appropriate "Fixes:" tag.
>>
>>> cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c:1621:5-8: Unneeded variable: "ret". Return " 0" on line 1655
>>>
>>> Fix the warning by removing the variable "ret" and returning 0 directly.
>>
>> cocci warning was spot on*. This fix is not just a change to "make a
>> warning go away" but instead fixing an actual problem.
>> It can just be "Remove the unneeded variable and return 0 directly".
>
> I'll fix all up before applying.
Thank you very much. For what it is worth, I do agree with the actual fix
and you can add:
Acked-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>> * I'll add a private setup with the goal to catch these earlier.
>
> Except that it doesn't fire with the patch that added the code. It looks
> like the cocci script needs adjustment...
Reinette
