> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 5:15 PM > To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx; giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > corbet@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-wired- > lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dong, Eddie <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>; Hall, Christopher S > <christopher.s.hall@xxxxxxxxx>; Brandeburg, Jesse > <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx; joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx; perex@xxxxxxxx; linux-sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; N, Pandith > <pandith.n@xxxxxxxxx>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa > <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@xxxxxxxxx>; T R, Thejesh Reddy > <thejesh.reddy.t.r@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator > > On 09.01.24 07:31, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 8:50 PM > >> To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx; giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> corbet@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; > >> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-wired- > >> lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dong, Eddie <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>; Hall, > >> Christopher S <christopher.s.hall@xxxxxxxxx>; Brandeburg, Jesse > >> <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx; joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx; perex@xxxxxxxx; > >> linux-sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nguyen, Anthony L > >> <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; N, Pandith <pandith.n@xxxxxxxxx>; > >> Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@xxxxxxxxx>; > >> T R, Thejesh Reddy <thejesh.reddy.t.r@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator > >> > [...] > >> At some point you should announce v1 of the series. RFC is usually > >> being neglected by many (busy) maintainers. > > > > This patch series is dependent on > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231215220612.173603-2- > peter.hilber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/ which is RFC. > > So I understand my dependency series being RFC prevents the PPS series from > dropping the RFC tag (correct me if I am wrong). > > I plan to send out a non-RFC version of the dependency series next. So far I think > there will only be polishing changes. Due to testing being some effort, I wanted > to test and send it together with some other series. > > But if this is blocking the PPS series, I think I could send out a non-RFC version of > the dependency series earlier (by the end of January?). Please let me know what > would align with the PPS series timeline. Thanks Peter, This timeline should be okay. We will also send non-RFC v1 by the same time. Regards, Sowjanya > Regards, > > Peter > > > > > Regards, > > Sowjanya > >> > >> -- > >> With Best Regards, > >> Andy Shevchenko > >> > >
