On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:39:30PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > Personally I think the device should have sub-nodes. It's how we > dealt with our DB8500 and AB8500 and it works very well. At the end of > the day these all-in-one chips do house very different devices. I see > no harm in describing them that way. I'm sure other OSes can make use > of the sub-devices in similar ways. For some bits of the device it makes sense - the regulators are a good example with this device - but for others it's more questionable if the Linux division of the device into subsystems is general enough (or even static for Linux - like this one where there's the 32kHz clock being handled by the RTC driver binding in the last patch posted).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
