Hi--
On 1/7/24 22:21, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> Provide documentation that explains how to properly do CMODX in riscv.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/arch/riscv/cmodx.rst | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Documentation/arch/riscv/index.rst | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/cmodx.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/cmodx.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..71598850e131
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/cmodx.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +==============================================================================
> +Concurrent Modification and Execution of Instructions (CMODX) for RISC-V Linux
> +==============================================================================
> +
> +CMODX is a programming technique where a program executes instructions that were
> +modified by the program itself. Instruction storage and the instruction cache
> +(icache) is not guaranteed to be synchronized on RISC-V hardware. Therefore, the
are not
> +program must enforce its own synchronization with the unprivileged fence.i
> +instruction.
> +
> +However, the default Linux ABI prohibits the use of fence.i in userspace
> +applications. At any point the scheduler may migrate a task onto a new hart. If
> +migration occurs after the userspace synchronized the icache and instruction
> +storage with fence.i, the icache will no longer be clean. This is due to the
> +behavior of fence.i only affecting the hart that it is called on. Thus, the hart
> +that the task has been migrated to, may not have synchronized instruction
to may not
> +storage and icache.
> +
> +There are two ways to solve this problem: use the riscv_flush_icache() syscall,
> +or use the ``PR_RISCV_SET_ICACHE_FLUSH_CTX`` prctl() and emit fence.i in
> +userspace. The syscall performs a one-off icache flushing operation. The prctl
> +changes the Linux ABI to allow userspace to emit icache flushing operations.
> +
> +1. prctl() Interface
> +---------------------
Why is "1." needed here? or is it?
> +
> +Call prctl() with ``PR_RISCV_SET_ICACHE_FLUSH_CTX`` as the first argument. The
> +remaining arguments will be delegated to the riscv_set_icache_flush_ctx
> +function detailed below.
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> + :identifiers: riscv_set_icache_flush_ctx
> +
> +Example usage:
> +
> +The following files are meant to be compiled and linked with each other. The
> +modify_instruction() function replaces an add with 0 with an add with one,
> +causing the instruction sequence in get_value() to change from returning a zero
> +to returning a one.
> +
> +cmodx.c::
> +
> + #include <stdio.h>
> + #include <sys/prctl.h>
> +
> + extern int get_value();
> + extern void modify_instruction();
> +
> + int main()
> + {
> + int value = get_value();
> + printf("Value before cmodx: %d\n", value);
> +
> + // Call prctl before first fence.i is called inside modify_instruction
> + prctl(PR_RISCV_SET_ICACHE_FLUSH_CTX_ON, PR_RISCV_CTX_SW_FENCEI, 0);
> + modify_instruction();
> +
> + value = get_value();
> + printf("Value after cmodx: %d\n", value);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> +cmodx.S::
> +
> + .option norvc
> +
> + .text
> + .global modify_instruction
> + modify_instruction:
> + lw a0, new_insn
> + lui a5,%hi(old_insn)
> + sw a0,%lo(old_insn)(a5)
> + fence.i
> + ret
> +
> + .section modifiable, "awx"
> + .global get_value
> + get_value:
> + li a0, 0
> + old_insn:
> + addi a0, a0, 0
> + ret
> +
> + .data
> + new_insn:
> + addi a0, a0, 1
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/index.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/index.rst
> index 4dab0cb4b900..eecf347ce849 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/index.rst
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ RISC-V architecture
> patch-acceptance
> uabi
> vector
> + cmodx
>
> features
>
>
Thanks.
--
#Randy
