On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:14 PM Tiago Lam <tiagolam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think we can drop the reference to the `--path <buildir>` to avoid > giving too much information to the users following the guide. It doesn't > seem to bring anything given users should now always go through `make > rustupoverride`. Yeah, the idea with the new target was to simplify this, rather than have it as an additional way. > But if I understood this correctly, the point here is that with the new > target we can now abstract both cases behind the `make rustupoverride` > target - i.e. we don't need to provide alternatives. Exactly. Cheers, Miguel
