Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> +$(YNL_INDEX): $(YNL_RST_FILES) $(YNL_TOOL) >> + $(Q)$(YNL_TOOL) -o $@ -x > > Isn't $(YNL_INDEX) depending to $(YNL_TOOL) indirectly since it depends > on $(YNL_RST_FILES) ? > > I mean, do you really need the line above? Sure, the transitive dependency is sufficient. I tend to add an explicit dependency for a script that gets run in a target. Happy to remove that change and respin if you prefer?
