On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 02:57:42PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:13:34AM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > > In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context, > > we will need two functions for applying pwm changes: > > > > int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *); > > int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *); > > > > This commit just deals with renaming pwm_apply_state(), a following > > commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. > > > > Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx> > > Not a in-detail-review, but I just noticed again, that we have > > K: pwm_(config|apply_state|ops) > > in MAINTAINERS. That one needs adaption, too. Fixed in v7. Thanks, Sean
