On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:57 PM Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:17:08AM -0800, Peter Newman wrote:
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:56 AM Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > @@ -2715,7 +2723,25 @@ static int rdt_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
> > > case Opt_mba_mbps:
> > > if (!supports_mba_mbps())
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > - ctx->enable_mba_mbps = true;
> > > + if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
> > > + ctx->enable_mba_mbps_local = true;
> > > + else
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + return 0;
> > > + case Opt_mba_mbps_event:
> > > + if (!supports_mba_mbps())
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (!strcmp("mbm_local_bytes", param->string)) {
> > > + if (!is_mbm_local_enabled())
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + ctx->enable_mba_mbps_local = true;
> > > + } else if (!strcmp("mbm_total_bytes", param->string)) {
> > > + if (!is_mbm_total_enabled())
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + ctx->enable_mba_mbps_total = true;
> > > + } else {
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > It looks like if I pass
> > "mba_MBps_event=mbm_total_bytes,mba_MBps_event=mbm_local_bytes" I can
> > set both flags true.
>
> That's going to be confusing. I'll add code to stop the user from
> passing both options.
Also kind of confusing, after reading the second patch, I realized
"mba_MBps_event=mbm_total_bytes,mba_MBps" also results in both being
set. If you're able to fail the mount operation if both flags somehow
get set, that would address this one too.
-Peter
