On 12/3/23 01:14, sxwjean@xxxxxx wrote: > From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi, > > Patch 1 is to remove an unused parameter. This patch actually is v3, but > it is not reasonable to add v3 tag in the cover letter, so I put the > change history inside the patch. > > --- > Patch 2 is to replace slub_$params with slab_$params. > Vlastimil Babka pointed out we should use "slab_$param" as the primary > prefix for long-term plan. Please see [1] for more information. > > This patch is to do that. However, the patch is big, I'm not sure if > everything is proper in it, so I added "RFC" in the patch title. For more > information please see the commit message of patch. > > I did the basic tests with qemu, which passed values by sl[au]b_max_order, > sl[au]b_min_order, sl[au]b_min_objects and sl[au]b_debug in command line. > The values looks correct by printing them out before calculating orders. > > One thing I'm not sure about the forth parameter of __setup_param(), > Is it correct to set the parameter to 0 directly? Yep it's fine.
