Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Did you want an explicit "list:" in the yaml schema? > > You mean instead of the "formats" or in addition somewhere? > Under sub-messages? > > The "formats" is basically a "list", just feels less artificial > to call it something else than "list". No strong preference, tho. > > If you mean under "sub-messages" - I can't think of any extra property > we may want to put there. So going directly to entries seems fine. Sorry, I wasn't clear - yes, under sub-messages. Thanks!