On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 11:17 +0000, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Decouple kvm_range_has_memory_attributes() from struct kvm's
> mem_attr_array to allow other memory attribute sources to use the
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 9 +++++----
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 96421234ca88..4ace2f8660b0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -7297,7 +7297,8 @@ static bool hugepage_has_attrs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> const unsigned long end = start + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
>
> if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M)
> - return kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(kvm, start, end, attrs);
> + return kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(&kvm->mem_attr_array,
> + start, end, attrs);
>
> for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1)) {
> if (hugepage_test_mixed(slot, gfn, level - 1) ||
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 4242588e3dfb..32cf05637647 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -2391,8 +2391,8 @@ kvm_get_memory_attributes(struct xarray *mem_attr_array, gfn_t gfn)
> return xa_to_value(xa_load(mem_attr_array, gfn));
> }
>
> -bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> - unsigned long attrs);
> +bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct xarray *mem_attr_array, gfn_t start,
> + gfn_t end, unsigned long attrs);
> bool kvm_arch_pre_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
> bool kvm_arch_post_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index fde004a0ac46..6bb23eaf7aa6 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2440,10 +2440,10 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_clear_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
> * Returns true if _all_ gfns in the range [@start, @end) have attributes
> * matching @attrs.
> */
> -bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> - unsigned long attrs)
> +bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct xarray *mem_attr_array, gfn_t start,
> + gfn_t end, unsigned long attrs)
> {
> - XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
> + XA_STATE(xas, mem_attr_array, start);
> unsigned long index;
> bool has_attrs;
> void *entry;
> @@ -2582,7 +2582,8 @@ static int kvm_vm_set_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>
> /* Nothing to do if the entire range as the desired attributes. */
> - if (kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(kvm, start, end, attributes))
> + if (kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(&kvm->mem_attr_array, start, end,
> + attributes))
> goto out_unlock;
>
> /*
Same comments as for previous patch + how about
'kvm_gfn_range_has_memory_attributes'
(I didn't review the memfd patch series and it shows :( )
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
