On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:36:44PM -0400, Huang Shijie wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 02:50:32PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Looking at the current header there just seem to be defines in there, no > > abstraction for the chips. Perhaps that is what is missing? > we do not need any abstraction for this chip, we only need the SPI NOR > commands, such as Quad read / DDR quad read. So the abstraction could say what the commands are, or what's supported if they're standard?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature