Re: [PATCH v1] docs: gpu: rfc: i915_scheduler.rst remove unused directives for namespacing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/11/2023 17:31, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Nov 2023, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 09:47:08AM -0400, Hunter Chasens wrote:
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst
>>> index c237ebc024cd..23ba7006929b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst
>>> @@ -135,13 +135,9 @@ Add I915_CONTEXT_ENGINES_EXT_PARALLEL_SUBMIT and
>>>  drm_i915_context_engines_parallel_submit to the uAPI to implement this
>>>  extension.
>>>  
>>> -.. c:namespace-push:: rfc
>>> -
>>>  .. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>>          :functions: i915_context_engines_parallel_submit
>>>  
>>> -.. c:namespace-pop::
>>> -
> 
> What makes the namespacing unnecessary?
> 
> $ git grep '.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h'
> Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst:.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_scheduler.rst:.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> 
> And you get [1] and [2].
> 
>>>  Extend execbuf2 IOCTL to support submitting N BBs in a single IOCTL
>>>  -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>  Contexts that have been configured with the 'set_parallel' extension can only
>>
>> The warnings go away, thanks!
> 
> What warnings go away?
> 

Oops, I mean the patch author had silenced these warnings.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux