Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] hwmon: max31827: Add support for max31828 and max31829

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/27/23 06:00, Matyas, Daniel wrote:
[ ... ]

I also don't understand why that would be chip specific. I don't see
anything along that line in the datasheet.

Ah, wait ... I guess that is supposed to reflect the chip default.
I don't see why the chip default makes a difference - a well defined default
must be set either way. Again, there is no guarantee that the chip is in its
default state when the driver is loaded.

The well defined default was set in v4, but I deleted it, because the default value in hex for max31827 and max31828 alarm polarity, and max31827 fault queue is 0x0. I had 2 #defines for these values, but you said:
" Since MAX31827_ALRM_POL_LOW is 0, this code doesn't really do anything and just pollutes the code."

So, I thought I should remove it altogether, since res is set to 0 in the beginning and the default value of these chips (i.e. 0) is implicitly set.


Also, why are the default values added in this patch and not in the
previous patch ?


In v4 these default values were set in the previous patch.

I asked you (or meant to ask you) to stop overwriting 0 with 0
in a variable. I didn't mean to ask you (if I did) to stop writing
the default value into the chip. Sorry if I did; if so, that was
a misunderstanding.

Guenter





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux