Re: [PATCH v2] doc: blk-ioprio: Bring the doc in line with the implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Our system administrator have noted that the names 'rt-to-be' and
> 'all-to-idle' in the I/O priority policies table appeared without
> explanations, leading to confusion. Let's bring these names in line
> with the naming in the 'attribute' section.
>
> Additionally,
> 1. Correct the interface name to 'io.prio.class'.
> 2. Add a table entry of 'promote-to-rt' for consistency.
> 3. Fix a typo of 'priority'.
>
> Suggested-by: Yingfu Zhou <yingfu.zhou@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
> Accept Bart's suggestion and rename the title of the patch.
> Pick up Tao's Reviewed-by tag.
>
>  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

I've applied this, thanks.

jon




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux