Re: [PATCH 06/11] memblock: Improve memblock to support allocation from lower address.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/04/2013 08:24 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
......
+phys_addr_t __init_memblock
+__memblock_find_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
+		      phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid)

This func should be static as it must be an internal func.

......
+phys_addr_t __init_memblock
+__memblock_find_range_rev(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
+			  phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid)

Ditto.
......
+	if (memblock.current_order == MEMBLOCK_ORDER_DEFAULT)

This needs to use MEMBLOCK_ORDER_HIGH_TO_LOW since the code should be
independent from the value of MEMBLOCK_ORDER_DEFAULT.


OK, followed.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux