On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 9:40 AM Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:48:04 -0400 > Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:29 AM Kory Maincent > > <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Timestamping software or hardware flags are often used as a group, > > > therefore adding these masks will easier future use. > > > > This assumes that device support for timestamping is often symmetric: > > a device supports both rx and tx, or neither. > > > > All devices support software receive timestamping, as that timestamp > > is taken in the core network stack. But to support transmit timestamps > > drivers have to call sbk_tstamp_tx in their ndo_start_xmit. > > Yes, and in that software only case they often call ethtool_op_get_ts_info to > fill the timestamp info. > > There is several drivers that support hardware and software timestamp, these > mask could be useful for these. In case of asymmetric support we can still use > the SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX/TX_SOFTWARE flags. > > I forgot to specify, in the commit message but this patch is mainly to ease > the next patch of this series to deal with software/hardware time stamping. > Maybe you prefer to have this squash into next patch as had suggested Florian > in last version. Thanks. I did not see such use in net/ or in my experience of using setsockopt SO_TIMESTAMPING. But I had not considered net device get_ts_info. It would be useful there. Slight preference from me to keep this a separate patch, as it applies not only to the use case in your follow-on patch.