Not for inclusion, just for discussion... Modulo naming, do you think the new need_seqretry_xxx() makes sense? Simpler to use and less error prone. thread_group_cputime() is changed as an example. --- include/linux/seqlock.h | 10 ++++++++++ kernel/sched/cputime.c | 9 +++------ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h index d0050c889f26..9b3bc4ce3332 100644 --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h @@ -1165,6 +1165,16 @@ static inline int need_seqretry(seqlock_t *lock, int seq) return !(seq & 1) && read_seqretry(lock, seq); } +static inline int need_seqretry_xxx(seqlock_t *lock, int *seq) +{ + int ret = !(*seq & 1) && read_seqretry(lock, *seq); + + if (ret) + ++*seq; /* make this counter odd */ + + return ret; +} + /** * done_seqretry() - end seqlock_t "locking or lockless" reader section * @lock: Pointer to seqlock_t diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c index af7952f12e6c..45704a84baec 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ void thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times) struct signal_struct *sig = tsk->signal; u64 utime, stime; struct task_struct *t; - unsigned int seq, nextseq; + unsigned int seq; unsigned long flags; /* @@ -330,9 +330,8 @@ void thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times) rcu_read_lock(); /* Attempt a lockless read on the first round. */ - nextseq = 0; + seq = 0; do { - seq = nextseq; flags = read_seqbegin_or_lock_irqsave(&sig->stats_lock, &seq); times->utime = sig->utime; times->stime = sig->stime; @@ -344,9 +343,7 @@ void thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times) times->stime += stime; times->sum_exec_runtime += read_sum_exec_runtime(t); } - /* If lockless access failed, take the lock. */ - nextseq = 1; - } while (need_seqretry(&sig->stats_lock, seq)); + } while (need_seqretry_xxx(&sig->stats_lock, &seq)); done_seqretry_irqrestore(&sig->stats_lock, seq, flags); rcu_read_unlock(); } -- 2.25.1.362.g51ebf55