On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:24:41 -0600 Ahmed Zaki wrote: > > IMO fat warning in the documentation and ethtool man saying that this > > makes the algo (any / all) vulnerable to attack would be enough. > > Willem? > > Please advise on the next step. Should I send a new version with the Doc > warning, or will you use v5? Not just the doc changes: | We can use one of the reserved fields of struct ethtool_rxfh to carry | this extension. I think I asked for this at some point, but there's | only so much repeated feedback one can send in a day :( https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231016163059.23799429@xxxxxxxxxx/ You can take care of that, post v6 and see what Alex and Willem say.
