Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:57:38 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> The .ndo_do_ioctl() netdev operation used to be how one communicates >> with a network driver from userspace, but since my previous cleanup [1], >> it is purely internal to the kernel. >> >> Removing the cops appletalk/localtalk driver made me revisit the >> missing pieces from that older series, removing all the unused >> implementations in wireless drivers as well as the two kernel-internal >> callers in the ieee802154 and appletalk stacks. >> >> One ethernet driver was already merged in the meantime that should >> have used .ndo_eth_ioctl instead of .ndo_do_ioctl, so fix that as well. >> With the complete removal, any future drivers making this mistake >> cause build failures that are easier to spot. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201106221743.3271965-1-arnd@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Kalle, Johannes, do these apply for you? > I'm getting a small conflict on patch 8 and bigger one on patch 9. Yes, 'git am -3' was able to solve the conflicts automatically and these do apply to wireless-next. > If this applies for you maybe you can take it and flush out > wireless-next soon after? Ok, we'll do that. Does next Wednesday sound soon enough? :) -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
