Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Putting your patches inline would be the right thing to do in any case. > > I'm not sure if your client is showing it differently, but to me the patch > appears to be just like any other -- it's inline and properly formed. OK, weird...looking at the raw message it's definitely inline; no idea why notmuch is showing it as an attachment. >> Rather than force another round, I've tried to the patch directly (but >> see below), but it would be good to figure out why lore doesn't like it. >> Konstantin, any ideas? > > If you like, we can migrate linux-doc to the new infrastructure and then you > will probably see it on lore faster than it's delivered into your inbox. :) Sure, I'd be happy to see it move anytime. Thanks, jon
