Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] sched/topology: change behaviour of sysctl sched_energy_aware based on the platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Shrikanth,
Some NITs about the commit message:

On 9/29/23 17:52, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
sysctl sched_energy_aware is available for the admin to disable/enable
energy aware scheduling(EAS). EAS is enabled only if few conditions are
met by the platform. They are, asymmetric CPU capacity, no SMT,
schedutil CPUfreq governor, frequency invariant load tracking etc.
A platform may boot without EAS capability, but could gain such
capability at runtime For example, changing/registering the CPUfreq

Missing dot I think: 'runtime. For example,'

governor to schedutil.

At present, though platform doesn't support EAS, this sysctl returns 1
and it ends up calling build_perf_domains on write to 1 and
NOP when writing to 0. That is confusing and un-necessary.

I'm not sure I fully understand the sentence:
- it sounds that the user is writing a value to either 1/0
  (I think the user is writing 1/0 to the sysctl)
- aren't the sched domain rebuilt even when writing 0 to the sysctl ?
  I'm not sure I understand to what the NOP is referring to exactly.

What about:
Platforms without EAS capability currently advertise this sysctl.
Its effects (i.e. rebuilding sched-domains) is unnecessary on
such platforms and its presence can be confusing.


Desired behavior would be to, have this sysctl to enable/disable the EAS

Unnecessary comma I think

on supported platform. On Non supported platform write to the sysctl

Non supported  -> non-supported

would return not supported error and read of the sysctl would return
empty. So> sched_energy_aware returns empty - EAS is not possible at this moment
This will include EAS capable platforms which have at least one EAS
condition false during startup, e.g. using a Performance CPUfreq governor

Just a remark, using the performance governor is not exactly a condition
disabling EAS, it is more 'not using the schedutil CPUfreq governor'

sched_energy_aware returns 0 - EAS is supported but disabled by admin.
sched_energy_aware returns 1 - EAS is supported and enabled.

User can find out the reason why EAS is not possible by checking
info messages. sched_is_eas_possible returns true if the platform
can do EAS at this moment.

Depends on [PATCH v5 1/2] sched/topology: Remove EM_MAX_COMPLEXITY limit
to be applied first.

I think it's implied as the 2 patches are sent together.

Otherwise:
Tested-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx>


Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst |   3 +-
  kernel/sched/topology.c                     | 112 +++++++++++++-------
  2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
index cf33de56da27..d89ac2bd8dc4 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
@@ -1182,7 +1182,8 @@ automatically on platforms where it can run (that is,
  platforms with asymmetric CPU topologies and having an Energy
  Model available). If your platform happens to meet the
  requirements for EAS but you do not want to use it, change
-this value to 0.
+this value to 0. On Non-EAS platforms, write operation fails and
+read doesn't return anything.

  task_delayacct
  ===============
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index e0b9920e7e3e..a654d0186ac0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -212,6 +212,70 @@ static unsigned int sysctl_sched_energy_aware = 1;
  static DEFINE_MUTEX(sched_energy_mutex);
  static bool sched_energy_update;

+extern struct cpufreq_governor schedutil_gov;
+static bool sched_is_eas_possible(const struct cpumask *cpu_mask)
+{
+	bool any_asym_capacity = false;
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+	struct cpufreq_governor *gov;
+	int i;
+
+	/* EAS is enabled for asymmetric CPU capacity topologies. */
+	for_each_cpu(i, cpu_mask) {
+		if (per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, i)) {
+			any_asym_capacity = true;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	if (!any_asym_capacity) {
+		if (sched_debug()) {
+			pr_info("rd %*pbl: Checking EAS, CPUs do not have asymmetric capacities\n",
+				cpumask_pr_args(cpu_mask));
+		}
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	/* EAS definitely does *not* handle SMT */
+	if (sched_smt_active()) {
+		if (sched_debug()) {
+			pr_info("rd %*pbl: Checking EAS, SMT is not supported\n",
+				cpumask_pr_args(cpu_mask));
+		}
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (!arch_scale_freq_invariant()) {
+		if (sched_debug()) {
+			pr_info("rd %*pbl: Checking EAS: frequency-invariant load tracking not yet supported",
+				cpumask_pr_args(cpu_mask));
+		}
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	/* Do not attempt EAS if schedutil is not being used. */
+	for_each_cpu(i, cpu_mask) {
+		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(i);
+		if (!policy) {
+			if (sched_debug()) {
+				pr_info("rd %*pbl: Checking EAS, cpufreq policy not set for CPU: %d",
+					cpumask_pr_args(cpu_mask), i);
+			}
+			return false;
+		}
+		gov = policy->governor;
+		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+		if (gov != &schedutil_gov) {
+			if (sched_debug()) {
+				pr_info("rd %*pbl: Checking EAS, schedutil is mandatory\n",
+					cpumask_pr_args(cpu_mask));
+			}
+			return false;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
  void rebuild_sched_domains_energy(void)
  {
  	mutex_lock(&sched_energy_mutex);
@@ -231,6 +295,15 @@ static int sched_energy_aware_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
  		return -EPERM;

  	ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+	if (!sched_is_eas_possible(cpu_active_mask)) {
+		if (write) {
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		} else {
+			*lenp = 0;
+			return 0;
+		}
+	}
+
  	if (!ret && write) {
  		state = static_branch_unlikely(&sched_energy_present);
  		if (state != sysctl_sched_energy_aware)
@@ -351,61 +424,24 @@ static void sched_energy_set(bool has_eas)
   *    4. schedutil is driving the frequency of all CPUs of the rd;
   *    5. frequency invariance support is present;
   */
-extern struct cpufreq_governor schedutil_gov;
  static bool build_perf_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
  {
  	int i;
  	struct perf_domain *pd = NULL, *tmp;
  	int cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_map);
  	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(cpu)->rd;
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-	struct cpufreq_governor *gov;

  	if (!sysctl_sched_energy_aware)
  		goto free;

-	/* EAS is enabled for asymmetric CPU capacity topologies. */
-	if (!per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu)) {
-		if (sched_debug()) {
-			pr_info("rd %*pbl: CPUs do not have asymmetric capacities\n",
-					cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map));
-		}
-		goto free;
-	}
-
-	/* EAS definitely does *not* handle SMT */
-	if (sched_smt_active()) {
-		pr_warn("rd %*pbl: Disabling EAS, SMT is not supported\n",
-			cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map));
-		goto free;
-	}
-
-	if (!arch_scale_freq_invariant()) {
-		if (sched_debug()) {
-			pr_warn("rd %*pbl: Disabling EAS: frequency-invariant load tracking not yet supported",
-				cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map));
-		}
+	if (!sched_is_eas_possible(cpu_map))
  		goto free;
-	}

  	for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
  		/* Skip already covered CPUs. */
  		if (find_pd(pd, i))
  			continue;

-		/* Do not attempt EAS if schedutil is not being used. */
-		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(i);
-		if (!policy)
-			goto free;
-		gov = policy->governor;
-		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-		if (gov != &schedutil_gov) {
-			if (rd->pd)
-				pr_warn("rd %*pbl: Disabling EAS, schedutil is mandatory\n",
-						cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map));
-			goto free;
-		}
-
  		/* Create the new pd and add it to the local list. */
  		tmp = pd_init(i);
  		if (!tmp)
--
2.39.3




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux