Re: [PATCH V11 03/17] riscv: Use Zicbop in arch_xchg when available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 01:07:40PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:22:26AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 04:28:57AM -0400, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ...
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h
> > > > index 6960beb75f32..dc590d331894 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h
> > > > @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@
> > > >  
> > > >  #define RV_OPCODE_MISC_MEM	RV_OPCODE(15)
> > > >  #define RV_OPCODE_SYSTEM	RV_OPCODE(115)
> > > > +#define RV_OPCODE_PREFETCH	RV_OPCODE(19)
> > > 
> > > This should be named RV_OPCODE_OP_IMM and be placed in
> > > numerical order with the others, i.e. above SYSTEM.
> > > 
> > > >  
> > > >  #define HFENCE_VVMA(vaddr, asid)				\
> > > >  	INSN_R(OPCODE_SYSTEM, FUNC3(0), FUNC7(17),		\
> > > > @@ -196,4 +197,8 @@
> > > >  	INSN_I(OPCODE_MISC_MEM, FUNC3(2), __RD(0),		\
> > > >  	       RS1(base), SIMM12(4))
> > > >  
> > > > +#define CBO_prefetchw(base)					\
> > > 
> > > Please name this 'PREFETCH_w' and it should take an immediate parameter,
> > > even if we intend to pass 0 for it.
> > 
> > It makes sense.
> > 
> > The mnemonic in the previously mentioned documentation is:
> > 
> > prefetch.w offset(base)
> > 
> > So yeah, makes sense to have both offset and base as parameters for 
> > CBO_prefetchw (or PREFETCH_w, I have no strong preference).
> 
> I have a strong preference :-)
> 
> PREFETCH_w is consistent with the naming we already have for e.g.
> cbo.clean, which is CBO_clean. The instruction we're picking a name
> for now is prefetch.w, not cbo.prefetchw.

btw, the CBO_foo stuff was named that way as we were using them in
alternatives originally as an argument, that manifested as:
"cbo." __stringify(_op) " (a0)\n\t"
That was later changed to
CBO_##_op(a0)
but the then un-needed (AFAICT) capitalisation was kept to avoid
touching the callsites of the alternative. Maybe you remember better
than I do drew, since the idea was yours & I forgot I even wrote that
pattch.
If this isn't being used in a similar manner, then the w has no reason
to be in the odd lowercase form.

Cheers,
Conor.

> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > +	INSN_R(OPCODE_PREFETCH, FUNC3(6), FUNC7(0),		\
> > > > +	       RD(x0), RS1(base), RS2(x0))
> > > 
> > > prefetch.w is not an R-type instruction, it's an S-type. While the bit
> > > shifts are the same, the names are different. We need to add S-type
> > > names while defining this instruction. 
> > 
> > That is correct, it is supposed to look like a store instruction (S-type), 
> > even though documentation don't explicitly state that.
> > 
> > Even though it works fine with the R-type definition, code documentation 
> > would be wrong, and future changes could break it.
> > 
> > > Then, this define would be
> > > 
> > >  #define PREFETCH_w(base, imm) \
> 
> I should have suggested 'offset' instead of 'imm' for the second parameter
> name.
> 
> > >      INSN_S(OPCODE_OP_IMM, FUNC3(6), IMM_11_5(imm), __IMM_4_0(0), \
> > >             RS1(base), __RS2(3))
> > 
> > s/OPCODE_OP_IMM/OPCODE_PREFETCH
> > 0x4 vs 0x13
> 
> There's no major opcode named "PREFETCH" and the spec says that the major
> opcode used for prefetch instructions is OP-IMM. That's why we want to
> name this OPCODE_OP_IMM. I'm not sure where the 0x4 you're referring to
> comes from. A 32-bit instruction has the lowest two bits set (figure 1.1
> of the unpriv spec) and table 27.1 of the unpriv spec shows OP-IMM is
> 0b00100xx, so we have 0b0010011. Keeping the naming of the opcode macros
> consistent with the spec also keeps them consistent with the .insn
> directive where we could even use the names directly, i.e.
> 
>  .insn s OP_IMM, 6, x3, 0(a0)
> 
> > > 
> > > When the assembler as insn_r I hope it will validate that
> 
> I meant insn_s here, which would be the macro for '.insn s'
> 
> > > (imm & 0xfe0) == imm
> 
> I played with it. It won't do what we want for prefetch, only
> what works for s-type instructions in general, i.e. it allows
> +/-2047 offsets and fails for everything else. That's good enough.
> We can just mask off the low 5 bits here in our macro
> 
>  #define PREFETCH_w(base, offset) \
>     INSN_S(OPCODE_OP_IMM, FUNC3(6), IMM_11_5((offset) & ~0x1f), \
>            __IMM_4_0(0), RS1(base), __RS2(3))
> 
> Thanks,
> drew

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux