Re: [PATCH 0/4] Why no v2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/13/23 08:21, Daniel Matyas wrote:
This is kind of v2, but not exactly. Major changes were applied and
commits were separated. The latter is the main reason why I did not call
this v2.


That is neither a reason nor a valid argument. Just call it v2 and mark
the added patch(es) with a changelog along the line of "v2: Added patch".

And a subject of "Why no v2?" is really useless and pointless.

Guenter




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux