On 9/1/23 1:18 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Hi Eduard,
On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
head: be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
Hi Daniel,
Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.
I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
tried several sphinx versions:
- 1.7.9
- 2.4.4
- 4.3.2
I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
way compatible with test robot.
Strange, perhaps LKP folks could chime in and provide some more guidance e.g.
wrt Sphinx version.
Thanks,
Daniel
