Moves the description of the best effort mitigation mode to the table of the possible values in the mds and tsx_async_abort docs, and adds the same one to the mmio_stale_data doc. Signed-off-by: Takahiro Itazuri <itazur@xxxxxxxxxx> --- v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230830144426.80258-1-itazur@xxxxxxxxxx/ - Puts the desc into the table of the possible values. --- Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.rst | 33 ++++++++----------- .../hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst | 13 +++++++- .../admin-guide/hw-vuln/tsx_async_abort.rst | 32 ++++++++---------- 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.rst index 48ca0bd85..0fe98151a 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.rst @@ -102,9 +102,19 @@ The possible values in this file are: * - 'Vulnerable' - The processor is vulnerable, but no mitigation enabled * - 'Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode' - - The processor is vulnerable but microcode is not updated. - - The mitigation is enabled on a best effort basis. See :ref:`vmwerv` + - The processor is vulnerable but microcode is not updated. The + mitigation is enabled on a best effort basis. + + If the processor is vulnerable but the availability of the microcode + based mitigation mechanism is not advertised via CPUID, the kernel + selects a best effort mitigation mode. This mode invokes the mitigation + instructions without a guarantee that they clear the CPU buffers. + + This is done to address virtualization scenarios where the host has the + microcode update applied, but the hypervisor is not yet updated to + expose the CPUID to the guest. If the host has updated microcode the + protection takes effect; otherwise a few CPU cycles are wasted + pointlessly. * - 'Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers' - The processor is vulnerable and the CPU buffer clearing mitigation is enabled. @@ -119,23 +129,6 @@ to the above information: 'SMT Host state unknown' Kernel runs in a VM, Host SMT state unknown ======================== ============================================ -.. _vmwerv: - -Best effort mitigation mode -^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - - If the processor is vulnerable, but the availability of the microcode based - mitigation mechanism is not advertised via CPUID the kernel selects a best - effort mitigation mode. This mode invokes the mitigation instructions - without a guarantee that they clear the CPU buffers. - - This is done to address virtualization scenarios where the host has the - microcode update applied, but the hypervisor is not yet updated to expose - the CPUID to the guest. If the host has updated microcode the protection - takes effect otherwise a few cpu cycles are wasted pointlessly. - - The state in the mds sysfs file reflects this situation accordingly. - Mitigation mechanism ------------------------- diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst index c98fd1190..1302fd1b5 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst @@ -225,8 +225,19 @@ The possible values in this file are: * - 'Vulnerable' - The processor is vulnerable, but no mitigation enabled * - 'Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode' - - The processor is vulnerable, but microcode is not updated. The + - The processor is vulnerable but microcode is not updated. The mitigation is enabled on a best effort basis. + + If the processor is vulnerable but the availability of the microcode + based mitigation mechanism is not advertised via CPUID, the kernel + selects a best effort mitigation mode. This mode invokes the mitigation + instructions without a guarantee that they clear the CPU buffers. + + This is done to address virtualization scenarios where the host has the + microcode update applied, but the hypervisor is not yet updated to + expose the CPUID to the guest. If the host has updated microcode the + protection takes effect; otherwise a few CPU cycles are wasted + pointlessly. * - 'Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers' - The processor is vulnerable and the CPU buffer clearing mitigation is enabled. diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/tsx_async_abort.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/tsx_async_abort.rst index 014167ef8..c6400fe6b 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/tsx_async_abort.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/tsx_async_abort.rst @@ -98,7 +98,19 @@ The possible values in this file are: * - 'Vulnerable' - The CPU is affected by this vulnerability and the microcode and kernel mitigation are not applied. * - 'Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode' - - The system tries to clear the buffers but the microcode might not support the operation. + - The processor is vulnerable but microcode is not updated. The + mitigation is enabled on a best effort basis. + + If the processor is vulnerable but the availability of the microcode + based mitigation mechanism is not advertised via CPUID, the kernel + selects a best effort mitigation mode. This mode invokes the mitigation + instructions without a guarantee that they clear the CPU buffers. + + This is done to address virtualization scenarios where the host has the + microcode update applied, but the hypervisor is not yet updated to + expose the CPUID to the guest. If the host has updated microcode the + protection takes effect; otherwise a few CPU cycles are wasted + pointlessly. * - 'Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers' - The microcode has been updated to clear the buffers. TSX is still enabled. * - 'Mitigation: TSX disabled' @@ -106,24 +118,6 @@ The possible values in this file are: * - 'Not affected' - The CPU is not affected by this issue. -.. _ucode_needed: - -Best effort mitigation mode -^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - -If the processor is vulnerable, but the availability of the microcode-based -mitigation mechanism is not advertised via CPUID the kernel selects a best -effort mitigation mode. This mode invokes the mitigation instructions -without a guarantee that they clear the CPU buffers. - -This is done to address virtualization scenarios where the host has the -microcode update applied, but the hypervisor is not yet updated to expose the -CPUID to the guest. If the host has updated microcode the protection takes -effect; otherwise a few CPU cycles are wasted pointlessly. - -The state in the tsx_async_abort sysfs file reflects this situation -accordingly. - Mitigation mechanism -------------------- -- 2.40.1
