Hi, On 8/28/23 11:44, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > The patchwork states are largely self-explanatory but small > ambiguities may still come up. Document how we interpret > the states in networking. > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > CC: corbet@xxxxxxx > CC: workflows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > CC: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst > index c1c732e9748b..5d16fbb93d25 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst > @@ -120,7 +120,32 @@ Status of a patch can be checked by looking at the main patchwork > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/ > > The "State" field will tell you exactly where things are at with your > -patch. Patches are indexed by the ``Message-ID`` header of the emails > +patch: of the patch's email. ? > + > +================== ============================================================= > +Patch state Description > +================== ============================================================= > +New, Under review pending review, patch is in the maintainer’s queue for review > +Accepted patch was applied to the appropriate networking tree, this is > + usually set automatically by the pw-bot > +Needs ACK waiting for an ack from an area maintainer or testing > +Changes requested patch has not passed the review, new revision is expected > + with appropriate code and commit message changes > +Rejected patch has been rejected and new revision is not expected > +Not applicable patch is expected to be applied outside of the networking > + subsystem > +Awaiting upstream patch should be reviewed and handled by appropriate > + sub-maintainer, who will send it on to the networking trees > +Deferred patch needs to be reposted later, usually due to dependency > + or because it was posted for a closed tree > +Superseded new version of the patch was posted, usually set by the > + pw-bot > +RFC not to be applied, usually not in maintainer’s review queue, > + pw-bot can automatically set patches to this state based > + on subject tags Nit: Above line uses tabs for indentation. All other lines here use spaces. > +================== ============================================================= > + > +Patches are indexed by the ``Message-ID`` header of the emails > which carried them so if you have trouble finding your patch append > the value of ``Message-ID`` to the URL above. > Thanks. -- ~Randy
