Hi Jonathan, On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 11:15, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > I would like to do something like this: > > > > struct part_driver { > > /** > > * get_info() - Get information about a partition > > > > ^ causes error > > > > * > > * @desc: Block device descriptor > > * @part: Partition number (1 = first) > > * @info: Returns partition information > > */ > > int (*get_info)(struct blk_desc *desc, int part, struct > > disk_partition *info); > > ... > > }; > > > > But this gives: > > > > scripts/kernel-doc:292: > > print STDERR "Incorrect use of kernel-doc format: $_"; > > > > Without the brackets on get_info() it works OK. What is the purpose of > > that check, please? > > That's how the kerneldoc syntax was defined, well before my time as the > maintainer. This could be relaxed, I guess, but one would have to look > at the parsing code to be sure that the right thing happens all the way > through the process. I'm not entirely sure it's worth it... I see. It is inconsistent, since we use () after normal functions. I think I can fix it just by removing that check. Regards, Simon