On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 03:51:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:40:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 03:27:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > There was some random patch you just sent me the message ID for in the > > > replies to something from Stephen which I'm fairly sure I queued, > > > perhaps it was a different thing or git thought it was a noop when it > > > was applied? > > > The first version is here [1]. > > Then it was a discussion about Linux Next build issues [2]. > > > In the discussion I mentioned: > > > The 20230713165320.14199-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx had been sent. > > > which is exactly what [1] is. > > > I have no idea how it can be a noop, but the patch is missing as far > > as I can tell. > > > This thread is v2 of what was in [1]. > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20230713165320.14199-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20230713121627.17990c86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > So there's two versions of the patch and for some reason v1 was > mentioned yesterday but there's also a v2 version? Yes, and I forgot to initially Cc you for v2. If you are using b4, you can take Message ID of this message and I am sure it capable to retrieve v2 of the patch. Or I can resend with you in Cc list. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
