Re: [PATCH] docs/sp_SP: Add translation of process/contribution-maturity-model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Translate Documentation/process/contribution-maturity-model.rst into
> Spanish
>
> Signed-off-by: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../process/contribution-maturity-model.rst   | 120 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../translations/sp_SP/process/index.rst      |   1 +
>  2 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/contribution-maturity-model.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/contribution-maturity-model.rst b/Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/contribution-maturity-model.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..36a6f9727933
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/contribution-maturity-model.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +.. include:: ../disclaimer-sp.rst
> +
> +:Original: :ref:`Documentation/process/contribution-maturity-model.rst`

So that line creates this build warning:

> Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/contribution-maturity-model.rst:4:
> WARNING: undefined label: documentation/process/contribution-maturity-model.rst

Please be sure to do a docs build and ensure that you're not adding
warnings before sending patches.

The fix in this case is to make the line read simply:

> :Original: Documentation/process/contribution-maturity-model.rst

...and all the right things happen.  I've made that fix and applied the
patch this time.

Thanks,

jon



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux