On Monday 19 August 2013 02:54 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 05:47 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> On Monday 19 August 2013 10:35 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Saturday 17 August 2013 03:51 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> On 08/16/2013 04:20 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VID detector, so modified the
>>>>> compatible type to *ti,palmas-usb-vid*.
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt
>>>>
>>>>> PALMAS USB COMPARATOR
>>>>> Required Properties:
>>>>> - - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb"
>>>>> + - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb-vid".
>>>>
>>>> Has the old value been published in a release kernel? If so, it makes
>>>
>>> No. This was merged only in 3.11-rc1. So I think we should take this version?
>>> Chanwoo can you take this patch?
>>
>> Ah.. the old values will be part of 3.11 kernel. So should we retain the old
>> values?
>
> What is the meaning of old value? previous value related to extcon-twl.txt?
We were discussing on whether to have "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb" in
compatible value in addition to "ti,palmas-usb-vid". Stephen wanted the old
values ("ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb") if it has been published in a
release kernel.
>
> The extcon-twl.txt was included in 3.11 kernel
Right. Since it's part of 3.11 kernel, I think we should retain the old
compatible values.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
