Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node

To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:25:17 +0200
Cc: corbet@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx, robin.murphy@xxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, kim.phillips@xxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230712074758.1133272-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
References: <20230712074758.1133272-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

It turns out this doesn't apply at all.  Can you resend it against
Linus' latest tree?

References:
- [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node
  - From: Yajun Deng