[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 08.07.23 15:37, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 08.07.23 15:20, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 7/8/23 06:07, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>> On 27.06.23 19:07, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> Guenter, please correct me if I'm wrong: >>> >>> This is fixed by Arnd's patch "sparc: mark __arch_xchg() as >>> __always_inline", but that afaics sadly hasn't even reached -next yet. >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230628094938.2318171-1-arnd@xxxxxxxxxx/ >>> >>> Hence adding it to the tracking now that the end of the merge window is >>> near: >>> #regzbot ^introduced d12157efc8e083c7 >>> #regzbot title locking/atomic: build error on sparc64:allmodconfig >>> #regzbot ignore-activity >> Yes, this is correct. > Thx for confirming (and also for adding the other regression to the > tracking). Let me use this opportunity to tell regzbot about the patch > for this regression, which I forgot to do earlier (sorry!): > #regzbot monitor: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230628094938.2318171-1-arnd@xxxxxxxxxx/ Kees applied this: https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ec7633de404e #regzbot fix: sparc: mark __arch_xchg() as __always_inline #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
