Re: [RFC PATCH v9 08/10] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 08/10] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu
From: Vitaly Grinberg <vgrinber@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 17:29:12 +0300
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>, andy.ren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx>, claudiajkang@xxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx, idosch@xxxxxxxxxx, intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jacek.lawrynowicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>, jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx, Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>, jonathan.lemon@xxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx, leon@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxx, liuhangbin@xxxxxxxxx, lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx, masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx, michal.michalik@xxxxxxxxx, milena.olech@xxxxxxxxx, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nicolas.dichtel@xxxxxxxxx, nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx, ogabbay@xxxxxxxxxx, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, phil@xxxxxx, Petr Oros <poros@xxxxxxxxxx>, razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ricardo.canuelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx, saeedm@xxxxxxxxxx, sj@xxxxxxxxxx, tzimmermann@xxxxxxx, vadfed@xxxxxx, vadfed@xxxxxxxx, vadim.fedorenko@xxxxxxxxx

Hi,
I'd like to clarify about the DPLL phase offset requirement. We can
live without it during the initial submission. The addition of phase
offset can be an increment to patch v10.
Thanks,
Vitaly

Prev by Date: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Add support for inlined documentation for kunit and kselftests
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] drm: add documentation for drm_buddy_test kUnit test
Previous by thread: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Add support for inlined documentation for kunit and kselftests
Next by thread: [PATCH docs] MAINTAINERS: treat Documentation/maintainer as process docs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]