On 12/07/2023 11:48, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:41:31AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Samsung ARM/ARM64 SoCs (except legacy S5PV210) are also expected not to >> bring any new dtbs_check warnings. In fact this have been already >> enforced and tested since few release. >> >> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- > >> Not sure where to document this. Creating new maintainer profile for >> Samsung SoC would be an overkill. OTOH, more SoCs might want to grow >> this list, so this also scales poor. > > To me, this portion of the document was "information to the > submaintainer", which would be you, not information to the contributors > to the platform. Adding the comment about Samsung SoC seems aimed at > contributors? Yes, I want to document it for contributors, so they won't be surprised. Any hints where to store it? I could put it in the "About" tab of my kernel.org repo, but no one checks this for contribution guidelines. Best regards, Krzysztof
