>From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 10:15 PM > >On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:17:51 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote: >> >I think better to add the check to pin-register so future synce pin >> >users don't have similar weird ideas. Could you please add this check? >> >> Don't think it is way to go, and I don't think there is anything good >> with preventing device drivers from labeling their pins the way they >>want. > >We had a long argument about how label should have a clearly defined >meaning. We're not going to rehash it on every revision. What did I miss :| Well, as I understand we are discussing if dpll subsystem shall prevent labeling the SyncE type pins. I have labeled them in ice explicitly with the name of a pci device they belong to. You haven't miss much, mostly the problem is described in this thread. Thank you! Arkadiusz
