Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcu: Use WRITE_ONCE() for assignments to ->next for rculist_nulls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 2023年7月11日 04:30,Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 04:01:07PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 6:29 AM Alan Huang <mmpgouride@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> When the objects managed by rculist_nulls are allocated with
>>> SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, readers may still hold references to this
>>> object that is being added, which means the modification of ->next
>>> is visible to readers. So, this patch uses WRITE_ONCE() for assignments
>>> to ->next.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/rculist_nulls.h | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
>>> index ba4c00dd8005..89186c499dd4 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
>>> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline void hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n,
>>> {
>>>        struct hlist_nulls_node *first = h->first;
>>> 
>>> -       n->next = first;
>>> +       WRITE_ONCE(n->next, first);
>>>        WRITE_ONCE(n->pprev, &h->first);
>>>        rcu_assign_pointer(hlist_nulls_first_rcu(h), n);
>>>        if (!is_a_nulls(first))
>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static inline void hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n,
>>>                last = i;
>>> 
>>>        if (last) {
>>> -               n->next = last->next;
>>> +               WRITE_ONCE(n->next, last->next);
>>>                n->pprev = &last->next;
>>>                rcu_assign_pointer(hlist_nulls_next_rcu(last), n);
>>>        } else {
>> 
>> Don't you need READ_ONCE() for the read-side accesses as well?
> 
> Both hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu() and hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_safe()
> use rcu_dereference_raw().  To your point, both hlist_nulls_first_rcu()
> and hlist_nulls_next_rcu() look rather strange.  I would have expected
> them to also use rcu_dereference_raw().

hlist_nulls_first_rcu() and hlist_nulls_next_rcu() were added in commit:

	67bdbffd696f(“rculist: avoid __rcu annotations”)

According to the commit message, this avoids warnings from missing __rcu annotations.

> 
> Thanx, Paul





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux