Hello, On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 09:38:12PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > I don't want to add another cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective control file. > One possibility is to keep another effective masks in the struct cpuset and > list both exclusive cpus set by the user and the effective ones side by > side, like "<cpus> (<effective_cpus>)" if they differ or some other format. > What do you think? Hmm... if we go for separate effective mask, I think it'd be better to stay consistent with cpuset.cpus[.effective]. That's the convention both cpuset.cpus and cpuset.mems already follow. I'm not sure what we'd gain by deviating. Thanks. -- tejun
