On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 02:55:33PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> -static inline swp_entry_t make_swapin_error_entry(void)
> +static inline swp_entry_t make_poisoned_swp_entry(void)
> {
> - return make_pte_marker_entry(PTE_MARKER_SWAPIN_ERROR);
> + return make_pte_marker_entry(PTE_MARKER_POISONED);
> }
>
> -static inline int is_swapin_error_entry(swp_entry_t entry)
> +static inline int is_poisoned_swp_entry(swp_entry_t entry)
> {
> return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) &&
> - (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_SWAPIN_ERROR);
> + (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_POISONED);
> }
These two can be slightly confusing when put together with hwpoison
entries, so maybe it'll be good to somehow attach a "marker" inside the
names:
make_poisoned_marker_entry()
is_pointed_marker_entry()
(the old helpers didn't attach a "marker" keyword because we started with
consuming a swp entry type, I think)
But we can still identify easily with "hw" prefix being there or not, so
it's still pretty clear at least to me. I'd say not worth a repost, so
your call to keep or change, just in case a new version for other reasons.
All fine here now:
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
