Re: [RFC PATCH 11/14] context-tracking: Introduce work deferral infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 12:23:57AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/context_tracking_state.h b/include/linux/context_tracking_state.h
> index fdd537ea513f..ec3d172601c5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/context_tracking_state.h
> +++ b/include/linux/context_tracking_state.h
> @@ -10,14 +10,19 @@
>  #define DYNTICK_IRQ_NONIDLE	((LONG_MAX / 2) + 1)
>  
>  enum ctx_state {
> +	/* Following are values */
>  	CONTEXT_DISABLED	= -1,	/* returned by ct_state() if unknown */
>  	CONTEXT_KERNEL		= 0,
>  	CONTEXT_IDLE		= 1,
>  	CONTEXT_USER		= 2,
> -	CONTEXT_GUEST		= 3,
> -	CONTEXT_MAX		= 4,
> +	/* Following are bit numbers */
> +	CONTEXT_WORK		= 2,
> +	CONTEXT_MAX		= 16,
>  };
>  
> +#define CONTEXT_MASK (BIT(CONTEXT_WORK) - 1)
> +#define CONTEXT_WORK_MASK ((BIT(CONTEXT_MAX) - 1) & ~(BIT(CONTEXT_WORK) - 1))
> +
>  /* Even value for idle, else odd. */
>  #define RCU_DYNTICKS_IDX CONTEXT_MAX

And that should be:

#define RCU_DYNTICKS_IDX BIT(CONTEXT_MAX)

Did I mention it's not even build tested? :o)



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux