On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, David Rientjes wrote:
> hackbench
Running hackbench on Skylake with v6.1.30 (A) and v6.1.30 + your patch
(B), for example:
LABEL | COUNT | MIN | MAX | MEAN | MEDIAN | STDDEV | DIRECTION
--------------------------------+-------+------------+------------+------------+------------+-----------+----------------
SReclaimable | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 11 | 129480.000 | 233208.000 | 189936.364 | 204316.000 | 31465.625 |
(B) <same sha> | 11 | 139084.000 | 236772.000 | 198931.273 | 213672.000 | 30013.204 |
| | +7.42% | +1.53% | +4.74% | +4.58% | -4.62% | <not defined>
SUnreclaim | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 11 | 305400.000 | 538744.000 | 422148.000 | 449344.000 | 65005.045 |
(B) <same sha> | 11 | 305780.000 | 518300.000 | 422219.636 | 450252.000 | 61245.137 |
| | +0.12% | -3.79% | +0.02% | +0.20% | -5.78% | <not defined>
Amount of reclaimable slab significantly increases which is likely not a
problem because, well, it's reclaimable. But I suspect we'll find other
interesting data points with the other suggested benchmarks.
And benchmark results:
LABEL | COUNT | MIN | MAX | MEAN | MEDIAN | STDDEV | DIRECTION
--------------------------------+-------+------------+------------+------------+------------+-----------+----------------
hackbench_process_pipes_234 | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 7 | 1.735 | 1.979 | 1.831 | 1.835 | 0.086291 |
(B) <same sha> | 7 | 1.687 | 2.023 | 1.886 | 1.911 | 0.10276 |
| | -2.77% | +2.22% | +3.00% | +4.14% | +19.09% | <not defined>
hackbench_process_pipes_max | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 7 | 1.735 | 1.979 | 1.831 | 1.835 | 0.086291 |
(B) <same sha> | 7 | 1.687 | 2.023 | 1.886 | 1.911 | 0.10276 |
| | -2.77% | +2.22% | +3.00% | +4.14% | +19.09% | - is good
hackbench_process_sockets_234 | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 7 | 7.883 | 7.909 | 7.899 | 7.899 | 0.0087808 |
(B) <same sha> | 7 | 7.872 | 7.961 | 7.907 | 7.904 | 0.028019 |
| | -0.14% | +0.66% | +0.10% | +0.06% | +219.09% | <not defined>
hackbench_process_sockets_max | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 7 | 7.883 | 7.909 | 7.899 | 7.899 | 0.0087808 |
(B) <same sha> | 7 | 7.872 | 7.961 | 7.907 | 7.904 | 0.028019 |
| | -0.14% | +0.66% | +0.10% | +0.06% | +219.09% | - is good
hackbench_thread_pipes_234 | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 7 | 2.146 | 2.677 | 2.410 | 2.418 | 0.18143 |
(B) <same sha> | 7 | 2.016 | 2.514 | 2.268 | 2.241 | 0.17474 |
| | -6.06% | -6.09% | -5.88% | -7.32% | -3.69% | <not defined>
hackbench_thread_pipes_max | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 7 | 2.146 | 2.677 | 2.410 | 2.418 | 0.18143 |
(B) <same sha> | 7 | 2.016 | 2.514 | 2.268 | 2.241 | 0.17474 |
| | -6.06% | -6.09% | -5.88% | -7.32% | -3.69% | - is good
hackbench_thread_sockets_234 | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 7 | 8.025 | 8.127 | 8.084 | 8.085 | 0.029755 |
(B) <same sha> | 7 | 7.990 | 8.093 | 8.042 | 8.035 | 0.035152 |
| | -0.44% | -0.42% | -0.53% | -0.62% | +18.14% | <not defined>
hackbench_thread_sockets_max | | | | | | |
(A) v6.1.30 | 7 | 8.025 | 8.127 | 8.084 | 8.085 | 0.029755 |
(B) <same sha> | 7 | 7.990 | 8.093 | 8.042 | 8.035 | 0.035152 |
| | -0.44% | -0.42% | -0.53% | -0.62% | +18.14% | - is good
