Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/speculation: Disable IBRS when idle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:27 AM Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  v4:
>   - Add a new __update_spec_ctrl() helper in patch 1.
>   - Rebased to the latest linux kernel.
>
>  v3:
>   - Drop patches 1 ("x86/speculation: Provide a debugfs file to dump
>     SPEC_CTRL MSRs") and 5 ("x86/idle: Disable IBRS entering mwait idle
>     and enable it on wakeup") for now.
>   - Drop the MSR restoration code in ("x86/idle: Disable IBRS when cpu
>     is offline") as native_play_dead() does not return.
>   - For patch ("intel_idle: Add ibrs_off module parameter to force
>     disable IBRS"), change the name from "no_ibrs" to "ibrs_off" and
>     document the new parameter in intel_idle.rst.
>
> For Intel processors that need to turn on IBRS to protect against
> Spectre v2 and Retbleed, the IBRS bit in the SPEC_CTRL MSR affects
> the performance of the whole core even if only one thread is turning
> it on when running in the kernel. For user space heavy applications,
> the performance impact of occasionally turning IBRS on during syscalls
> shouldn't be significant. Unfortunately, that is not the case when the
> sibling thread is idling in the kernel. In that case, the performance
> impact can be significant.
>
> When DPDK is running on an isolated CPU thread processing network packets
> in user space while its sibling thread is idle. The performance of the
> busy DPDK thread with IBRS on and off in the sibling idle thread are:
>
>                                 IBRS on         IBRS off
>                                 -------         --------
>   packets/second:                  7.8M           10.4M
>   avg tsc cycles/packet:         282.26          209.86
>
> This is a 25% performance degradation. The test system is a Intel Xeon
> 4114 CPU @ 2.20GHz.
>
> Commit bf5835bcdb96 ("intel_idle: Disable IBRS during long idle")
> disables IBRS when the CPU enters long idle (C6 or below). However, there
> are existing users out there who have set "intel_idle.max_cstate=1"
> to decrease latency. Those users won't be able to benefit from this
> commit. This patch series extends this commit by providing a new
> "intel_idle.ibrs_off" module parameter to force disable IBRS even when
> "intel_idle.max_cstate=1" at the expense of increased IRQ response
> latency. It also includes a commit to allow the disabling of IBRS when
> a CPU becomes offline.
>
>
> Waiman Long (4):
>   x86/speculation: Add __update_spec_ctrl() helper
>   x86/idle: Disable IBRS when cpu is offline
>   intel_idle: Use __update_spec_ctrl() in intel_idle_ibrs()
>   intel_idle: Add ibrs_off module parameter to force disable IBRS

x86 maintainers, if you want to take care of this series, please feel
free to add

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

to all of the patches in it.

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux