On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 07:20:48AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 04:21:26PM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Enable io_uring commands on network sockets. Create two new
> > SOCKET_URING_OP commands that will operate on sockets. Since these
> > commands are similar to ioctl, uses the _IO{R,W} helpers to embedded the
> > argument size and operation direction. Also allocates a unused ioctl
> > chunk for uring command usage.
> >
> > In order to call ioctl on sockets, use the file_operations->uring_cmd
> > callbacks, and map it to a uring socket function, which handles the
> > SOCKET_URING_OP accordingly, and calls socket ioctls.
> >
> > This patches was tested by creating a new test case in liburing.
> > Link: https://github.com/leitao/liburing/commit/3340908b742c6a26f662a0679c4ddf9df84ef431
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Isn't this a new version of an older patch?
Yes, this should have tagged as V2.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230406144330.1932798-1-leitao@xxxxxxxxxx/#r
> > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> > @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments
> > 0xCB 00-1F CBM serial IEC bus in development:
> > <mailto:michael.klein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 0xCC 00-0F drivers/misc/ibmvmc.h pseries VMC driver
> > +0xCC A0-BF uapi/linux/io_uring.h io_uring cmd subsystem
>
> This change is nice, but not totally related to this specific one,
> shouldn't it be separate?
This is related to this patch, since I am using it below, in the
following part:
+#define SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCINQ _IOR(0xcc, 0xa0, int)
+#define SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCOUTQ _IOR(0xcc, 0xa1, int)
Should I have a different patch, even if they are related?
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uring_sock_cmd);
>
> Did you forget the "io_" prefix?
Yes, I will rename the function.
Thanks for the review.
